Butch's New Clothes?

CIA Admits Nazi Connection Introduction by Robert Lederman (9-26-2000) Followed by article from UPI http://www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes] Conspicuous by its silence the CIA owned and influenced media did virtually no coverage of what may be one of the decades biggest stories. Only UPI issued any statement on the CIA's admission that following WWII Hitler's top general in charge of espionage transferred his entire network of thousands of spies and double agents to what became the newly-formed CIA. What makes this much more than an interesting footnote to history is that the entire domestic and foreign history of the CIA has been molded by these former Nazis whose ideas on Eugenics, race, social control, biowarfare and propaganda dominate the policies of countless "think tanks" like the Rockefeller-funded Manhattan Institute and have influenced the U.S. government at its highest levels. During the past five decades numerous isolated revelations about Nazis imported to America by the Dulles brothers, William Casey and others have broken through the media blackout. These stories usually revolve around former concentration camp guards who hid their identity when emigrating. What makes this different is that General Ghelen was the #1 Nazi in this program. By acknowledging a CIA connection to Ghelen the entire can of worms can now be pried open. For excellent published works on the CIA/Nazi connection read: "Trading With The Enemy" by Charles Higham and "The Secret War Against the Jews" by Loftus and Arrons Blowback by Christopher Simpson For my articles on the connection to Mayor Giuliani and the Bush family see: http://Baltech.org/lederman/spray/ *** CIA says Nazi general was intelligence source From UPI 9/20/2000 20:28 (ET) COLLEGE PARK, Md., Sept. 20 (UPI) -- The Central Intelligence Agency has for the first time confirmed that a high-ranking Nazi general placed his anti-Soviet spy ring at the disposal of the United States during the early days of the Cold War. The National Archives said in a release Wednesday that the CIA had filed an affidavit in U.S. District Court "acknowledging an intelligence relationship with German General Reinhard Gehlen that it has kept secret for 50 years." "The CIA's announcement marks the first acknowledgement by that agency that it had any relationship with Gehlen and opens the way for declassification of records about the relationship," the National Archives said. Gehlen was Hitler's senior intelligence officer on the Eastern Front during the war and transferred his expertise and contacts to the U.S. as World War II reached its climax. While Gehlen's relationship with U.S. intelligence during the 1940s and 1950s has been the topic of some five books over the years, the eventual release of CIA documents pertaining to the development of his European spy ring could shed new light on the origins of the Cold War and early U.S. espionage efforts against Moscow. Gehlen's network of agents in Europe - including many with Nazi backgrounds who were bailed out of prisoner of war camps by U.S. intelligence officers - was known as the Gehlen Organization and received millions of dollars in funding from the U.S. until 1956. The CIA's acknowledgement of its dealings with Gehlen came in a response to an appeal of a Freedom of Information Act request by researcher Carl Oglesby, the National Archives said. The agency pledged to release its records on the general in accordance with the Nazi War Crimes Disclosure Act. The Act established the Nazi War Criminal Records Interagency Working Group (IWG), which for more than two years has been declassifying documents related to World War II war crimes and releasing them through the National Archives. "This shows that the law is working," said former Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman, a member of the IWG. "We now must work closely with the Agency to follow through with the release of these records." ~~~ Guess expensive liberal-arts colleges don't teach you everything... :0) __________________ They certainly don't. In fact, they teach us that we don't know everything and never will. If you are going to refer to a news story that is barely a month old and was only released by UPI as evidence of ignorance then I'm afraid you have a tremendous monkey on your back - I hope this has removed it. Now are you done? __________________ Ur fun to argue with even if you do hate guns ;0) __________________ and more importantly...he's safer to argue with because he hates guns... __________________ Oh I don't hate guns. Frankly, I think they're pretty fun and I might consider owning one later in life for target shooting. But if it's legislated that I'm not allowed to have one I'm not gonna cry about it. But as far as the threat I pose, I have much less of a problem with shooting a person than shooting an animal . . . so don't get too cocky (c: Mavi forum