i think i was one of the first persons (if not the first) on got|apex to suggest a need deals forum. there were several people opposed to it when i suggested the idea, but it appears to have taken off quite well. hopefully it will remain as active as it has been in the last day or two. i think one of the reasons people visit that forum is that they are interested in seeing the deals other people are requesting because they too might be looking for a similar deal. keep up the good work guys! __________________ hey coleslaw!how's it goin? i know this is wayyy off topic but i just wanted to make sure the handspring was working okay with you. thanks again __________________ hey muffdivr! it sure is! i love it actually. i've actually recommended it to several people already. thanks again!__________________ I think I at first supported it, and over the last month, was convinced that it wouldn't work. But I am pleasantly surprised, both by how well it's comin' along, and how much more nicely the gotdeals forum is looking. So much less cluttered! Hooray for all, and make sure to keep visiting.__________________ yeah, i've noticed that the got deals forum is less cluttered as well. that means that people should be able to get in on more deals because they stay on the first page longer without getting pushed down by all of the requests.__________________ hope this lasts. But this has not really gone through real testing until a few more months when new members build up and others come back. I mean the got Deals page was quite good until a recent surge of ppl amoung other factors.__________________ hmmm... truth is the ppl posting in Need Deals are the ones who obey the rules... the ones that don't still cluttering Got deals.... I just saw like 10 that are wrong over there.__________________ ...making my job almost fulltime __________________ quote: =P o well yea i see a lot more locks on those topics lately =) |
Friday, May 25, 2007
need deals forum looking good so far
Posted by
Admin
at
10:07 PM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment